Ms. Senath is teaching math to a diverse group of students. When presenting math instruction, she should begin with which approach?

Beginning math instruction with a concrete to abstract approach is effective because it aligns with how students, particularly younger ones or those who struggle with mathematical concepts, comprehend new information. This method allows students to first engage with tangible materials or real-life examples that they can manipulate and observe.

By starting with concrete examples, such as using physical objects or drawings, students can build a strong foundational understanding of mathematical concepts. Once they grasp these concrete representations, they can gradually transition to more abstract symbols and ideas, such as numbers and equations. This progression helps solidify their understanding and makes it easier for them to apply these concepts in more complex situations.

In contrast, an abstract to concrete approach might confuse students who are not yet ready to relate symbols and numbers to real-world scenarios, potentially leading to misconceptions or a lack of confidence in their abilities. The other approaches, while also relevant in different contexts, do not specifically address the foundational progression that supports learners in grasping mathematical concepts effectively.